home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- FROM THE PUBLISHER, Page 28
-
-
-
- Each week we receive more than 1,400 letters from our
- readers. They arrive first class and, unlike the mass
- third-class mailings that are the subject of our cover story,
- they are always deeply appreciated. We find them especially
- interesting when they comment on, or even sharply criticize,
- our stories. The fact is, we too often have debates about what
- we publish. This week's cover story by associate editor Jill
- Smolowe, as well as the cover image itself, raised such internal
- concerns when it was proposed.
-
- Our first worry: the Time Inc. Magazine Co. is one of the
- largest direct-mail generators in the world. Since the
- proliferation of what its detractors call junk mail is clearly
- controversial, why call attention to a practice in which our
- parent company is deeply engaged?
-
- Other concerns: Would the fact that each of our almost 4
- million subscribers received a personally addressed message on
- this week's cover raise unwarranted forebodings about how the
- wondrous technology of personalized printing might infringe on
- their privacy? Also: in creating our personalized covers we
- took advantage of the "ink jet" process, which, when combined
- with "selective binding," permits our magazine (and direct
- mail) to be aimed at readers with almost intimate accuracy. Our
- advertisers, in fact, have used this printing capability to
- send personalized messages to our wide range of subscribers.
- Might some suspicious types think that our cover artwork,
- rather than springing full blown, as it did, from the fertile
- design keyboard of deputy art director Arthur Hochstein, had
- roots in some commercial impulse to show off our technology to
- advertisers?
-
- The editors weighed these concerns, and then acted in a
- TIME-honored way. They ignored them. The phenomenon of the
- amazing growth of junk mail is a large, interesting and
- significant story. Yes, as is so often the case in this era of
- large, diverse communications companies, the discussion strikes
- close to home, but editors must go about their business. That's
- what our co-founder, Henry Luce, had in mind when he decreed
- decades ago that we should maintain a separation of "church"
- (the editorial side of the magazine) and "state" (the business
- side). So our editors, with what I like to think were slightly
- apologetic smiles, proceeded with this week's story. You know,
- it's pretty good.
-
-
- -- Louis A. Weil III
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-